SMS Radetzky: the last Austrian pre-dreadnought
In February 1906, HMS Dreadnought was leaving Portsmouth shipyards. On the same date back in the Adriatic, the three Herzerzog were in completion. The latter carried four 240 mm guns and displaced 10 000 tons versus ten 305 mm and 20,000 tons for the first one. This simple comparison illustrated the gap between Austro-Hungarian shipbuilding at the time, hampered by numerous budget cuts, and aggravated the break between dreadnoughts and pre-dreadnoughts. The Admiralty, now led by Admiral Montecuccoli, was conscious of having to study a new generation of a battleship.

SMS Zrinyi
Development of the Radetzky
From the launch of the Herzerzog Friedrich, a new type of battleship was started, to be integrated into a massive modernization plan comprising twelve modern battleships, four battlecruisers, and eight light cruisers. Between September 25 and September 29 1905, a meeting was setup to decide specifications for the future battleship. 5 plans were studied, Monteccucoli and the staff leaning for a battleship design with four 305 mm guns and eight 190 mm in barbettes and turrets, while Karl Popper, director of shipbuilding at STT, had opted for a configuration of six 305 mm guns divided into two twin turrets fore and aft and two single turrets on the broadside. Eventually, the Admiralty decided for the first project, knowing that the STT holds in Trieste could not receive a vessel displacing more than 16,000 tons. Some modifications were made to the plan, including the replacement of the 190 mm by 240 mm guns in twin turrets, like the British King Edward VII class Battleships.

Design of the Radetzky
Herzherzog painting
In terms of hull size, the generous dimensions allowed, while remaining within the limit of 15,000 tons, more powerful machines, but still no turbines. A good compromise was found, like partially sacrificing protection, and the three battleships could sustain 20.5 knots. This remained lower than the Italian Regina Elena (21.5 or 22 knots) but higher than the French Danton (19.5 knots) and British pre-dreadnought battleships in general. In the end, the Erzherzog Ferdinand Max was started in September 1907, the Radetzky in November, and the Zrinyi in January 1909. They were completed respectively in June 1910, January and September 1911. At the same time, in Great Britain new dreadnoughts bearing ten 343 mm guns were started. The Radetzky, despite their qualities, were a generation behind.

Austro-Hungarian torpedo-boat 86F and Herzerzog-Franz-Ferdinand
Critics
Their modest protection and imposing armament made them somewhat unstable, subject to roll, and their underwater protection, intended to lower the effects of a mine explosion, was based on F. Popper’s mathematical calculations, without tests. Prerequisites, a relatively thin double hull, designed to spread the shock of a standard 100 kgs mine. Like the others, these battleships were equipped with torpedo nets deployed at anchor, but this aggravated their relative instability when sailing.

SMS Radetzky
Career
Spearheading the fleet (1st division) before the arrival of the dreadnoughts of the Viribus Unitis class, the Radetzky formed the 2nd line division in 1914. Apart from coastal shelling missions in August 1914 on the Montenegrin coast and in May 1915 on the Italian coast, they remained at Pola until capitulation. SMS Radetzky and Zrinyi were once interned in Split under good guard of the US Navy, and after the Treaty of St Germain attributed to Italy which had them broken up in 1921, and the Herzerzog F. Ferdinand in 1926.

SMS Zrinyi
Radetzky class specifications |
|
| Dimensions | 138.8 x 24.6 x 8 m () |
| Displacement | 14,500 tonnes standard, 15,850 tonnes FL |
| Crew | 890 |
| Propulsion | 2 shafts, 2 engines 4 cyl. VTE, 12 Yarrow boilers, 19,800 hp |
| Speed | 20.5 knots (38 km/h; 23 mph) |
| Armament | 4 x 305 mm (12 in), 8 x 254 mm (8.4 in), 20 x 100 mm (3.5 in), 2 x 66 (2.4 in), 5 x 47 (12 pdr), 3 TT side, stern sub 450 mm. |
| Armour | Belt 230, turrets 250-200, casemates 120, bridges 60, blockhouse 250 mm |

Author’s illustration of the Radetzki in 1914
Src/ Read More
Radetzky class battleship (wiki)
Conway’s all the world’s fighting ships 1906-1921

Latest Facebook Entry -
X(Tweeter) Naval Encyclopedia's deck archive
Instagram (@navalencyc)





French Navy
Royal Navy
Russian Navy
Armada Espanola
Austrian Navy
K.u.K. Kriegsmarine
Dansk Marine
Nautiko Hellenon
Koninklije Marine 1870
Marinha do Brasil
Osmanlı Donanması
Marina Do Peru
Marinha do Portugal
Regia Marina 1870
Nihhon Kaigun 1870
Preußische Marine 1870
Russkiy Flot 1870
Svenska marinen
Søværnet
Union Navy
Confederate Navy
Armada de Argentina
Imperial Chinese Navy
Marinha do Portugal
Mexico
Kaiserliche Marine
1898 US Navy
Sovietskiy Flot
Royal Canadian Navy
Royal Australian Navy
RNZN Fleet
Chinese Navy 1937
Kriegsmarine
Chilean Navy
Danish Navy
Finnish Navy
Hellenic Navy
Polish Navy
Romanian Navy
Turkish Navy
Royal Yugoslav Navy
Royal Thai Navy
Minor Navies
Albania
Austria
Belgium
Columbia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Czechoslovakia
Dominican Republic
Haiti
Hungary
Honduras
Estonia
Iceland
Eire
Equador
Iran
Iraq
Latvia
Liberia
Lithuania
Mandchukuo
Morocco
Nicaragua
Persia
San Salvador
Sarawak
Uruguay
Venezuela
Zanzibar
Warsaw Pact Navies
Bulgaria
Hungary

Bundesmarine
Dutch Navy
Hellenic Navy
Marina Militare
Yugoslav Navy
Chinese Navy
Indian Navy
Indonesian Navy
JMSDF
North Korean Navy
Pakistani Navy
Philippines Navy
ROKN
Rep. of Singapore Navy
Taiwanese Navy
Vietnam People’s Navy
IDF Navy
Saudi Navy
Royal New Zealand Navy
Egyptian Navy
South African Navy





























Ukrainian Navy
I appreciated very much the thoroughness and Yet sinthetic description of tecnical and historic background, and political too, within a small space .
Thanks Antonio !
That’s indeed how i’m proceeding most if the time, gathring info from many sources. It’s packed info like in a granola bar.
Although this one in particular is quite expurged and would need an enhancement.
Cheers,
It’s weird how two 305mm gun weight more than 8 24mm gun.
Hello Nodeo, if you refer to the first part of the article i don’t understand your point, it’s about total tonnage not individual gun tonnage.
Cheers
Well to me it seem quite strange that 8 24 cm gun increased the ship weight more than 2 30.5cm gun.
Ps. Do you think that if they went with 2 triple turret they can accommodate 6 30.5cm gun?
To me it seems strange that 8 24cm gun add more tonnages to the ship more than 2 30.5cm gun.
By the way if the Austian have gone with 2 triple turret do you think they could have accommodate 6 30.5cm gun?